The content of this website is protected under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which are beliefs based on personal experiences with Brian Keisacker as well as court orders issued by the Circuit Court. Sarasota County Ordinance 22-127(3) which Brian Keisacker has willingly and purposefully violated by serving on the Sarasota County General Contractors Licensing and Examining Board as a consumer representative, which states... "The citizen at large member shall be selected for appointment from Sarasota County resident applicants deriving no income from any source connected with the construction industry."
Brian Keisacker has clearly and is willfully violating the law, ethics and his credibility. He is a construction attorney and earns income from the construction industry, clearly a violation of the law and ethics!


NO EXCIUSES Brian Keisacker

Brian Keisacker either:

Maybe Brian Keisacker went to law school but wasn't paying attention?

It is possible that Brian Keisacker did not comprehend what the questions and answers were on the Bar exam?

Brian Keisacker might have forgotten what Brian Keisacker learned.

I doubt Brian Keisacker cannot read the laws he is supposed to be upholding and adhering to.

BRIAN KEISACKER 741254


Brian Keisacker may have changed his values from the US Constitution he swore an oath to follow and defend and Brian Keisacker decided to follow the same path of the worst tyrants and dictators of the world? That is to do as he pleases and disrespect our Constitution.

Did Brian Keisacker decide he will do as he pleases, by deliberately ignoring the laws of the United States.

OR

Brian Keisacker has deliberately violated the law and Brian Keisacker has DELIBERATELY decided that the US Constitution and all it stands for does NOT apply where Brian Keisacker sits illegally and Brian Keisacker no longer (or never did) has the values that the US Constitution guarantees.

The facts speak for themselves.

BRIAN KEISACKER 8989

Brian Keisacker cannot one day say that the county attorney's office said it was ok for Brian Keisacker to serve on the local construction board illegally, since that defense has been used by many of the world's notorious criminals that have said that a voice in their head told them to do horrible things or Charles Manson told them to do it… Surely this will be what is anticipated when Brian Keisacker is forced to answer for his actions before a Federal Judge and jury.

Brian Keisacker

TO BECOME A LAWYER, BRIAN KEISACKER WAS REQUIRED TO TAKE AN EXAMINATION CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING:

General Bar Examination Information


Administration

The General Bar Examination consists of two parts: Part A and Part B. Part A consists of three hours spent answering essay questions and three hours of 100 multiple-choice questions. Florida Rules of Civil and Criminal Procedure and the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration comprise one segment. Questions on the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration will address only the following areas: disqualification of trial judges; public access to judicial branch records; minimization of the filing of sensitive information; the qualifications, restrictions, and conditions pertaining to attorneys in their representation of clients in Florida Courts; and the signature of attorneys and parties on pleadings and other papers. The remaining five segments, each of which will embrace no more than three subjects, are selected from the following subjects, including their equitable aspects:

  • Florida Constitutional Law

  • Federal Constitutional Law

  • Trusts
  • Business Entities
  • Real Property
  • Evidence
  • Torts
  • Wills & Administration of Estates
  • Criminal Law, Constitutional Criminal Procedure, and Juvenile Delinquency
  • Contracts
  • Articles 3 and 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code
  • Family Law and Dependency
  • Chapters 4 & 5 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar
  • Professionalism

Federal Constitutional Law
4. Individual Rights

  • 4.2.  Due Process
  • 4.3.  Equal Protection
4.4. First Amendment Freedoms
BRIAN KEISACKER LAW GRADUATE?
1. Nature of Judicial Review
1.1. Organization and relationship of state and federal courts in a federal system
1.2. Jurisdiction 1.3. Judicial review in operation
2. Separation of Powers
  • 2.1.  Powers of Congress
  • 2.2.  Powers of the President
  • 2.3.  Federal Interbranch Relationships
3. Relations of Nation and States in a Federal System
  • 3.1.  Intergovernmental Immunities
  • 3.2.  Authority Reserved to the States
  • 3.3.  National Power to Override or Extend State Authority
  • 3.4.  Relations Among States
4. Individual Rights
  • 4.1.  “State Action” and the Role of the Courts
  • 4.2.  Due Process
  • 4.3.  Equal Protection
4.4. First Amendment Freedoms

EVIL BRIAN KEISACKER

Florida Constitutional Law
1. Declaration of Rights
  • 1.1.  Political Power
  • 1.2.  Basic Rights
  • 1.3.  Religious Freedom
  • 1.4.  Freedom of Speech and Press
  • 1.5.  Right to Assemble Peaceably and to Petition Government
  • 1.6.  Right to Work
  • 1.7.  Right to Bear Arms
  • 1.8.  Due Process
  • 1.9.  Prohibited Laws
  • 1.10.  Searches and Seizure
  • 1.11.  Habeas Corpus
  • 1.12.  Pretrial Release and Detention
  • 1.13.  Prosecution for Crime; Offenses Committed by Children
  • 1.14.  Rights of Accused and of Victims
  • 1.15.  Excessive Punishments
  • 1.16.  Access to Courts
  • 1.17.  Trial by Jury
  • 1.18.  Right of Privacy
  • 1.19.  Access to Public Records and Meetings

2. Separation of Powers

  • 2.1.  Executive Powers
  • 2.2.  Judicial Powers
  • 2.3.  Legislative Powers
3. Delegation of Powers
  • 3.1.  Delegation of Legislative Powers
  • 3.2.  Delegation of Judicial Power
4. Local Government
4.1. Counties
4.2. Municipalities
5. Suffrage and Elections
5.1. Regulation of Elections
5.2. Electors
5.3. Disqualification
5.4. Primary, General, and Special Elections

    • 7.1.  Revision Commission
    • 7.2.  Initiative by People
    • 7.3.  Judicial Review
    8. Miscellaneous
    • 8.1.  Homestead; Exemptions
    • 8.2.  Eminent Domain
    • 8.3.  Rules of Construction
    DELIBERATELY INDIFFERENT Brian Keisacker



    • UNETHICAL KEISACKER


    BRIAN KEISACKER SHAMEFUL


    BRIAN DAVID KEISACKER NO MORALITY WHATSOEVER


    BRIAN KEISACKER IS VILE AND INCOMPETENT